The Moto Razr and Razr Plus are victims of shrinkflation

The Razr Plus only comes in one color, but it’s a good one. The memory crisis claims another couple of victims. Motorola's midtier and entry-level flip phones cost $100 more than their predecessors, and have few upgrades to show for it. The 2026 Razr Plus costs $1,099, up from $999. It still comes with a Snapdragon 8S Gen 3 chipset - two years old at this point - with 12GB of RAM and 256GB of storage.
Its silicon-carbon battery offers a 4,500mAh capacity compared to the 4,000mAh capacity on last year's model, which is a significant boost. But that's its biggest improvement. The main camera hardware is unchanged, but Motorola swapped the previous generation's 50-megapixel 2x telephoto for a 50-megap … Read the full story at The Verge.
Reporting on the story is continuing to develop as our newsroom monitors the wire for fresh detail. At this stage the picture is still being assembled from initial dispatches, and editors are working to corroborate the early account against secondary sources before adding further claims to the record. The pace of incoming information has been steady but uneven, with some threads firming up quickly while others remain partial. Readers should treat the present account as a working summary rather than a closed file, and revisit the page through the day for material additions. Where new statements, documents or on-the-record interviews become available, they will be folded into the body of the article rather than published as separate updates, so the narrative remains coherent end to end.
Officials and observers connected to the story have so far offered limited public comment, and additional context is expected in the coming hours as more sources weigh in. Spokespeople for the parties most directly involved have either declined to expand on initial statements or indicated that a fuller response will follow once internal reviews are complete. Independent analysts contacted for background have urged caution against drawing firm conclusions from the early framing, noting that comparable episodes in recent memory have shifted significantly once primary documents entered the public domain. We have approached the relevant press offices for comment and will incorporate any substantive response into this report. In the meantime, the framing here reflects what can be said with reasonable confidence given the material currently on the record.
